Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Antonia Ruzic vs Celine Naef Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ruzic vs Naef analysis and find out who is favored!
Antonia Ruzic vs Celine Naef Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ruzic 1 - 0 Naef
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ruzic has won 46.61% of points on their second serve, while Naef has won 48.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ruzic, in recent form, has won 60.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naef has won 55.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.52% and 39.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ruzic has saved 51.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naef has saved 55.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ruzic has won 63.24% of matches played (W/L 43/ 25), with Naef winning 53.57% (W/L 30/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ruzic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 80% (W/L 59/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 23/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Ruzic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 42/ 24), where as Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 23/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ruzic winning 1 times and Naef being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ruzic winning 2 and Naef winning 1. The last match between Ruzic and Naef was at the W75 Zagreb, 14-05-2024, First, Clay with Antonia Ruzic getting the victory 6-4 4-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ruzic and Naef have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ruzic winning 1 times and Naef 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ruzic winning 0, and Naef 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ruzic has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.78 while Naef has played against players with an average rank of 195.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ruzic has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naef has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ruzic has converted 49.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naef has converted 44.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
207
Rank
182
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
155
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
67% (142-69)
Career Total W/L
67% (87-43)
66% (23-12)
YTD W/L
55% (17-14)
$42,613
Career Prize Money
$169,770
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Antonia Ruzic | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:23:0 | 2:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (66/104) | 60% (58/96) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (46/66) | 50% (29/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 29% (11/38) | 47% (18/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 54% (7/13) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (49/96) | 45% (47/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Antonia Ruzic | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (23/12) | 55% (17/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (50/32) | 58% (41/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (402/339) | 55% (356/292) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 90% (9/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (10/6) | 58% (11/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 68 | 95 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 95 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:58 | 1:36:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 297.86 | 186.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1474/2244) | 61% (1267/2087) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (889/1474) | 66% (840/1267) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (352/773) | 48% (394/820) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (155/322) | 46% (125/274) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (1108/2280) | 45% (967/2131) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (22/11) | 62% (16/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (23/35) | 55% (17/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 22% (2/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 89% (18/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 8% (13/1) |
Antonia Ruzic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Marina Stakusic
Player
Antonia Ruzic
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
4
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
8
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
39%
(
21 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
48%
(
62 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
122
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Heather Watson
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tara Wurth
Player
Antonia Ruzic
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Antonia Ruzic
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Antonia Ruzic
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Antonia Ruzic
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
53%
(
38 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Gabriela Ce
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Antonia Ruzic
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
3
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
6
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
34%
(
15 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
53%
(
52 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
51 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Celine Naef
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Celine Naef
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Daria Saville
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Celine Naef
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Celine Naef
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ruzic Vs Naef Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
